“Exposure to great art provides an invitation. It draws us forward and opens the doors of possibility.” — Rick Rubin, The Creative Act: A Way of Being

George Lucas has stated in numerous interviews that The Hidden Fortress by Akira Kurosawa was a major influence on Star Wars. I became aware of Kurosawa’s influence on Star Wars in the late 90s, but until recently, I had only seen one Kurosawa film, Rashomon. Recently, I watched The Hidden Fortress to better understand the connection between it and Star Wars.

Released on December 28, 1958 in Japan and produced by Sanezumi Fujimoto and Akira Kurosawa for the Toho Company, The Hidden Fortress was the fourth highest grossing film in Japan that year. The film went on to receive a lukewarm reception in the early 60s in the U.S, but it aged well with critics, who, in subsequent years, warmed up to it considerably. 

The Hidden Fortress is about Tahei and Matashichi, two peasants who sold everything they owned to fight in the war between the Yamana and Akizuki clans, hoping only to make a fortune. The Yamanas capture them, mistake them for Akizukis, and imprison them, forcing them to dig for rumored gold hidden in the Akizuki stronghold. They escape and discover that the Akizuki gold is actually concealed in pieces of wood. Makabe Rokurota, an Akizuki general, befriends Tahei and Matashichi and announces that they must travel to the safe land of Hayakawa. They escort Princess Yuki to Hayakawa, but she pretends to be mute, and Rokurota sends a decoy Princess to be executed so the Yamanas think that the Princess is dead. The band carries the hidden gold on horses. On the way, Rokurota meets his archenemy, Hyoe Tadokoro, and they have a sword fight–Rokurota wins. The group is eventually captured by the Yamanas, but Tadokoro has a change of heart and helps the group flee to safety. In the fray, Tahei and Matashichi find themselves lost in Hayakawa but stumble upon the lost gold. Hayakawa soldiers arrest them for being thieves. When brought before Hayakawa justice, the figures in power are actually Rokurota and Princess Yuki. They give Tahei and Matashichi a bar of gold to share. 

The most striking similarity between The Hidden Fortress and Star Wars is the resemblance between Tahei & Matashichi and C-3PO & R2-D2. Both the Hidden Fortress and Episode IV and VI of Star Wars, open with these two lesser characters bickering and, in so doing, frame the story. However, the characters in each are different in that Tahei & Mataschichi are fatally shortsighted in their choices while C-3PO & R2-D2 are highly intelligent, but treated as lesser sentient beings. A second similarity is the wide, sweeping shots in both films. But Kurosawa’s doesn’t use special effects. A third similarity is the loose analogs between Kenobi and Rokurota, Leia and Kuki, and Vader and Tadokoro. But beyond the simple archetypes, the characters in each are quite different. 

The Hidden Fortress surprised me. I expected it to be some kind of big Death Star-like adventure but it was much more pastoral. The Hidden Fortress resembles Star Wars Episode I more than any of the other Star Wars films, especially the scenes from Naboo. 

I gotta admit: having played in a semi-popular 90s band has ended up being a pretty good gig. Decades later, you can play in a town where you did relatively well and bring a decent crowd. People sing along. People take pictures. People stick around after the show to tell you how you haven’t changed in 30 years. And, the best part, you get to play your own songs.

On Saturday, July 15, 2023, Collapsis reunited for a show at Motorco Music Hall. The Mad Starlings and Alex Lawhon opened the show and the night was well attended. Originally, I had planned a much longer night of music, but after we got together to rehearse, the consensus was to pair down the set a bit. As the show ran, we played for 75 minutes, which is still fairly hefty.

The set that emerged in rehearsal took the basic order from our album, Dirty Wake, but substituted a few songs here and there. Rather than open with our single, “Automatic,” we saved that for second to last. In its place, we put an unreleased rocker, “Crocodile.” On four of the songs, Mike Ivanitch from the Mad Starlings played percussion. He rounded out “Wonderland” and “Dirty Wake” quite nicely. We closed with a cover of R.E.M.’s “These Days,” which most of us have been playing at the Maxell 90 R.E.M. tribute shows.

Most of the things about playing in a club band are still the same. For me, it never gets old seeing that your band is headlining a venue. It’s a bonus when someone takes the time to write your name in chalk on a massive chalkboard. I always like to read the backstage dressing room walls, too. Most of it is either dirty talk or band promotion, but it’s also like a crossroads. Every line tells a story. Every story has at least a pinch of truth.

The most interesting part of the night happened towards the end of the set. I heard someone in the crowd shouting for “Clay Pigeons,” a song we did for the film of the same name. We don’t play it often, if at all, because on “Clay Pigeons” I play piano and Ryan plays acoustic guitar. It’s a completely different posture for the band and we weren’t set up for it. So, as a spur of the moment thing, I played a vamp of “Clay Pigeons” before kicking into the heavy part of “Chartreuse.” Usually, a tease is enough to assuage a random request. But then, after the show, the woman who requested “Clay Pigeons” told me that it was her favorite song of all time and was disappointed that we didn’t play it. So, I grabbed an acoustic guitar, Carlos grabbed a snare, and we played a version of it on the club risers.

Collapsis will return.

“Exposure to great art provides an invitation. It draws us forward and opens the doors of possibility.” — Rick Rubin, The Creative Act: A Way of Being

Whenever I have considered the top of Rolling Stone‘s 500 Best Albums of All Time list, Bob Dylan’s Blood on the Tracks has always struck me as being ranked way too high. As of 2020, the album clocked in at #9. Its production always sounded dated to me and the songs, while good, seemed to have been performed too fast, like the musicians were all in a hurry. Strong reactions to art are often signs that one should pay closer attention. So, a few weeks ago, I forced myself to listen to Blood on the Tracks on repeat until I reached some kind of epiphany as to why I felt so strongly against the album being ranked so high. Around listen 11, I concluded that the merit of the album is in its lyrics and soon after came to an agreement with the consensus.

Produced by Bob Dylan and David Zimmerman and released on January 20, 1975, Blood on the Tracks is Bob Dylan’s 15th album. The album marked the beginning of Dylan’s return to popularity in the 1970s, after a string of stark departures from the folk style for which he is most well known. Blood on the Tracks has sold close to 3 million copies worldwide and is certified double platinum in the United States. 

Dylan’s albums up until Blood on the Tracks often contained a song or two about relationships, but they almost always skewed more towards social commentary, activism, or even humor. Blood on the Tracks seems to be completely about the demise of Bob Dylan’s marriage to Sara Lownds. The songs are all downers, totally introspective, and completely brilliant. The reason, it seems, the album is ranked so high is because it’s Dylan’s take on the universal theme of heartache and he tells his side of the story exceedingly well. 

In 2016, Dylan received a Nobel Prize for his song craft. Therein lies the genius of Blood on the Tracks. “Tangled Up in Blue” finishes each of its stanzas with its title line and, each time the line repeats, it casts a new light on the verses that came before it. None of the chord voicings or arrangements on Blood on the Tracks is too elaborate. However, the higher level meanings, far beyond the surface, inspire insights into human nature, sometimes several during a single listening. All of the songs on Blood on the Tracks are like this. The production has a mid-70s am radio sound, which, while not bad, doesn’t seem entirely necessary. Thankfully, there is a Bob Dylan Bootleg Series that, in Vol. 14, offers the original, stripped down versions of the songs. I prefer the Bootleg version of the album to the official release.

Exploring this master work changed me by turning my attention to the maxim less is more. Sometimes you don’t need drums on a track to make it more impactful. A song should speak for itself with just a voice and simple accompaniment. The production on Blood on the Tracks may have drawn immediate commercial attention to its songs, but, as the Bootlegs show, such attention was probably unnecessary. Blood on the Tracks, both the original version and the Bootleg, also invited my attention to other Bob Dylan albums I hadn’t yet heard. Of late, I’ve enjoyed Street-Legal, Infidels, Oh Mercy, Time Out of Mind, Love & Theft, and Tempest.

Up until last Monday, whenever I heard Metallica’s “For Whom the Bell Tolls,” I imagined some kind of medieval battle scape with swords and dragons. But then I read Ernest Hemingway’s novel of the same name, arrived at Chapter 27, and everything changed.

It’s not like the inspiration for Metallica’s opus had been a big secret or even in question, really. Songfacts.com states that the “lyrics are based on the 1940 Ernest Hemingway novel of the same name.” True. Although from that statement alone, one could easily conclude that Hemingway’s title and basic theme was just a mere spark that, perhaps, lightly influenced Metallica’s lyrics. To the contrary, the song tracks fairly closely to Hemingway’s prose.

Metallica’s “For Whom the Bell Tolls”Hemingway, For Whom the Bell Tolls, Chapter 27
“Make his fight, on the hill, in the early day. Constant chill deep inside.”“El Sordo was making his fight on a hilltop. . . . There had still been snow then, the snow that had ruined them . . . “
“Shouting gun, on they run, through the endless grey.”
“. . . the automatic rifle heavy on his back, the horse laboring, barrel heaving between his thighs, the sack of grenades swinging against one side, the sack of automatic rifle pans banging against the other, and Joaquín and Ignacio halting and firing, halting and firing to give him time to get the gun in place.”
“On they fight, for their right, yes, but who’s to say?”In chapter 26, the protagonist, Robert Jordan, contemplates war’s inherent moral conundrum.
“For a hill, men would kill — Why? They do not know. Stiffened wounds test their pride. Men of five, still alive, through the raging glow. Gone insane from the pain that they surely know.”“Of the five men who had reached the hilltop three were wounded. Sordo was wounded in the calf of his leg and in two places in his left arm. He was very thirsty, his wounds had stiffened, and one of the wounds in his left arm was very painful.”
“Take a look to the sky just before you die. It’s the last time you will.”“His head hurt very much and his arm was stiffening so that the pain of moving it was almost unbearable. He looked up at the bright, high, blue early summer sky as he raised the leather wine bottle with his good arm. He was fifty-two years old and he was sure this was the last time he would see that sky.”
“Blackened roar, massive roar, fills the crumbling sky. Shattered goal fills his soul with a ruthless cry.”“The planes came back three times and bombed the hilltop but no one on the hilltop knew it. Then the planes machine-gunned the hilltop and went away.”
“Stranger now are his eyes to this mystery. Hears the silence so loud.”“Then there were the hammering explosions past his ears and the gun barrel hot against his shoulder. It was hammering now again and his ears were deafened by the muzzle blast. Ignacio was pulling down hard on the tripod and the barrel was burning his back.”
Bonus: Horsey style wah-wah guitar solo at the end of the song. El Sordo shoots his horse.

The song, in its own right, is a work of genius. And now that I see what inspired it, I like it even more. “For Whom the Bells Tolls” is a perfect summary of this particular chapter of Hemingway’s novel. And yet it’s wholly original in its approach, tone, and execution. At first glance, Metallica and Ernest Hemingway don’t seem like they would play well together. But, after a closer look, they paint very similar pictures.

Please note: at no time am I suggesting that Metallica copied Hemingway. Rather, I feel like this is an excellent example of how creativity is a dialog. One person’s art goes on to influence another’s. After all, both draw on Devotions (1623) by John Donne:

“Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; therefore never send to know for whom the bells tolls; it tolls for thee.”

In the chorus of R.E.M.’s “These Days,” is Michael Stipe singing “Oh, it’s sunny out” or “All of sudden”? I don’t know. After a thousand listens, I hear it both ways. When I sang it with the Maxell 90 on Friday, April 21 at the Visulite Theatre, I sang it both ways, in my mind at least. The song goes by so fast and with such a blistering intensity that it’s hard to care in the moment if the lyric is right.

This third iteration of the Maxell 90 R.E.M. tribute wasn’t supposed to work. A NC Triangle scene isn’t supposed to draw well in Charlotte. Two of the marquee singers had to cancel at the last minute. Only half of the singers actually got a chance to check their songs before the show. But this show defied every omen and was, quite arguably, the best one yet.

I sat back stage for most of the night but snuck out a handful of times to see a few of the performances. Most of the time, we all just sat around and told stories. I got to answer a few questions about the Satellites video. I also had a chance to ask other performers about their artistry, which, in room like that one, is easily a masterclass in the performing arts.

Until next time . . .

Mike Garrigan, Jay Garrigan, and Alex Lawhon backstage at the Visulite Theatre, Charlotte, NC, April 21, 2023.

At last, we’ve released “Satellites,” a short film and accompanying single. The entire process, from inception to transmission, took eighteen months. The song first evolved from a fragment that Jonathan Fererri send me to a really good demo recording. “Satellites” begged for an accompanying video, so we embarked on a journey of uncertainty–videos are expensive and difficult to make. Using crowdfunding, calling in favors, and exhausting just about every resource we had, the video turned out better than we imagined it would.

The single is also available on streaming platforms and on my Bandcamp page. Enjoy.

During the roulette game that decided my higher ed reading curriculum, the ball did not land on The Great Gatsby. Nowadays, my reading list includes several masterworks I have overlooked. How I failed to notice F. Scott Fitzgerald’s masterpiece for this long puzzles me.  A terse, scathing portrait of the American Dream, The Great Gatsby is as relevant today as it was nearly a century ago.

Published in 1925, The Great Gatsby consists of only 47,094 words, which, by modern standards, is more of a novella than a novel. Critics and audiences dismissed Gatsby upon its release, but the novel found a revival during World War II when it circulated among soldiers serving abroad. After the war, Gatsby earned greater scrutiny by scholars and critics. Today, the literary community considers The Great Gatsby “The Great American Novel” because it embodies the development, character, and identity of the American experience, at least partially anyway.

Nick Carraway narrates Gatsby by telling the story of the summer he worked as a bond trader in New York City. He lived in West Egg, the new money area of Long Island, and his cousin, Daisy, lived in East Egg, the old money neighborhood. Daisy’s husband, Tom, is a brooding ex-footballer who’s best days are behind him. Jay Gatsby lives in a mansion next door to Nick’s modest accommodations. Gatsby is in love with Daisy and throws grand parties where strangers stay drunk for weeks. Tom is having an affair with Myrtle Wilson, the spouse of a mechanic who lives in the Valley of Ashes–the wasteland between Long Island and Manhattan. One day, Daisy accidentally runs over Myrtle with Gatsby’s car. Mr. Wilson thinks Gatsby killed Myrtle so he hunts Gatsby down. Labeled a tragedy, the story ends on a down note.

Without Carraway’s descriptive, poignant narration, the simple summary in the preceding paragraph reads like an episode of Dynasty. Fitzgerald compresses and foreshadows throughout the novel. I particularly liked his placement of the car wreck at the end of chapter three both as a foreshadowing device and as an overall commentary on the American Dream. The wreck, where one of the drunks from one of Gatsby’s opulent parties throws his car into a ditch and loses a wheel, hints at the big wreck later in the novel but also seems to say that the idea that anyone can ascend in society if they just work hard enough is false. Even if someone is able to rise in class, chances are, he or she won’t know how to act and will inevitably meet a disastrous end.

Critics found Baz Luhrmann’s 2013 film adaptation of The Great Gatsby challenging, but audiences seemed to enjoy it. The film grossed over $300 million and won a couple Oscars for design. I look forward to watching it.